Kai Blumberg
Kai Blumberg
> Unfashionable opinion: sometimes it's OK not to have a class for a concept in an ontology. I think it's still important to have purls for commonly used organismal classes...
From a food science perspective having a general concept for fish is needed.
I plan to ask the question at today's seminar.
Summary of @cmungall's answer from today's workshop: This is more a less a bug in the process. They plan on swapping out COB object properties for the original RO object...
If you guys end up deciding to go with a well flushed out version of UO, I will have scope to spend a good amount of time on it.
Yes thanks @matentzn much appreciated!
Thanks for you quick reply. Is there a class which could be used to describe rdf data?
According to http://www.salinityremotesensing.ifremer.fr/sea-surface-salinity/definition-and-units practical salinity unit (PSU): `is equivalent to per thousand or (o/00) or to g/kg.` The Minimum Information about any X Sequence standard (MIxS) v5 lists the preferred...
upto @cmungall if you still need this for MIxS. My understanding is that PSU should be equivalent to parts per thousand, but some people might want the unit still.
> I don't know if punning class vs datatype is allowed but it's kinda weird @cmungall if I understand correctly, the current use of UO that has the same purl...