jyn

@guswynn this is intentional, if we don't cache the changes then you always get 429. If you change a file, it should detect the change and look for dead links.

@guswynn is there any change you think we could make here? Otherwise I don't see much point in keeping the issue open. Maybe we should document this in the readme?

Long term I don't think either should be in-tree: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81848#issuecomment-787588985. But I guess it makes sense for the std guide to be the same as the rustc guide for now.

Well, there's also some overhead to having the repo in both places, either @ehuss has to update the submodule when he updates books or someone needs to be in charge...

> which I think would require using rustup override set nightly (or a cleaner solution) X.py has to be able to build with the beta compiler, so nightly should be...

@SkiFire13 right, well, there's not much we can do about that because rust-analyzer doesn't understand staged builds.

No, 2021 is stable on beta now.

@GuillaumeGomez that's fine, but we should help @dns2utf8 get --stage 1 working instead of recommending a command that takes twice as long.

> In my opinion building from `stage 2` and the CI artefacts should be possible in ~5min or less, but my current test gave me ~23min. So not that great...

Hi @dns2utf8, are you planning to work on this?