Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Do I correctly infer from the above discussion that `\begin{otherlanguage}{dutch}` would be more preferred syntax? (I didn't gather as much from skimming the manual) No, that's the babel `legacy`...
I would personally go for `\begin{dutch}`, but it is up to you. The `{lang}{}` environment is only for cases which do not work in the other case. These are some...
> Right, I'm not sure if `\begin{}` is recognized by spell checkers, in my case LTeX. Good point, but I suggest you check and report to them if it doesn't.
They state to support babel commands (not polyglossia), so using babel legacy commands is probably the way to go for now.
> For German I'm pretty sure that logically the month and day should be ordinals if both are present. If month and day are present, they should be ordinals, yes...
Fine with me, but note that the separator with (ordinal) day and month is `\adddot\addnbthinspace`, whereas for abbreviated month name it would need to be `\adddot\addnbspace`.
I am not sure. Maybe it is, and people use it.
It's not possible at the moment. Since the `fontspec` script tag is ambiguous in this case (`CJK` in both cases), one way is to check additionally for bcp47-script. Then you...
I have implemented this in master. If you can test the development version, that would be great (note, though, that due to our major code rewrite, you would need to...
@Udi-Fogiel I am getting an automated test run failure after this commit, but I cannot make sense of it.