Juliette
Juliette
Before we actually action this, we should have a good look at the security implications of allowing access to the `$handle` (not just here).
**Action plan**: 1. Needs confirmation if this issue still exists by writing a test to reproduce the issue. 2. If so: let's get it fixed. 3. If not: let's close...
Well, tests are currently also failing for that reason, so some experimenting to see if this would be stable enough is at least something to consider.
@jerrm Hiya! We're currently planning two triage sessions for Requests 2.0 and would like to invite you to join us in one or both of these sessions to talk us...
@mediaformat ;-) First focus was to work through the technical debt which had build up over the years. Next focus is bug fixes and new features. Let's discuss this and...
@Art4 In my opinion that would be a useful addition. We have semi-regular maintainer calls/working sessions. I'll put it on the agenda to discuss in the next one (and you'd...
@TysonAndre Hiya! Sorry for the long wait, but we're finally trying to get through the list of open PRs. We're currently planning two triage sessions for Requests 2.0 and would...
PR #493 is possibly a partial duplicate of this PR.
Other related issues: #135, #152, #153, #437
Thank you @pprkut . I'm not adverse to this change, but would like to see it covered by unit tests.