Jeffrey Newman

Well that's unfortunate, given that the whole point of this installer is to offer users an easy and non-confusing way to install ActivitySim. But I suppose it is still a...

I am perfectly happy to see Larch on conda as noarch. However, I understand this is not currently possible as Larch v5 includes compiled extension modules. It does build on...

Apparently I was not "watching" and didn't see this conversation initially. Count me in 👍

> And Arrow+Feather is ridiculously fast... Did some noodling on this over the weekend. +1 to ridiculously fast ... not just "I don't want to wait while the data saves...

Talk is cheap. Here instead is a straw man proposal for you all to beat around a bit. https://github.com/jpn--/arrowmatrix

> The development of the PyTables project (on which OMX relies) seems to be quite slow these days, and there doesn't seem to be any hurry in supporting the newly...

> I'm surprised that there wasn't a significant amount of time saved. The work by @toliwaga on this was in the context of ActivitySim. Overall the time spent loading HDF5...

While I've made these updates and all the regular CI tests pass (i.e. the results look correct), I have discovered the change to pandas 2.x incurs a **significant** runtime penalty...

Yeah, unfortunately ActivitySim has a lot of unique components, many of which use inconsistent settings or step through their computational processes in different ways. It makes it hard to take...

This is now addressed in #842, which provides a common interface pathway for sharrow control (skip, fastmath, and others potentially in the future)