Jeffrey Newman

Yes, user selectable dimensions regardless of whether you are showing a single box or multiple boxes On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:55 AM Jan Kwakkel wrote: > good point,...

I had not contemplated your option 2, but now that you point it out it's clearly a reasonable use case. But, I think it's a minor tweak to include it....

My conclusions: - `_adjacent_window_before` is being calculated correctly. - The expression motivating this issue is wrong, it should be `@(df.tour_count>1) * (df.tour_num == 1) * _adjacent_window_before`, i.e. multiply not bitwise-and,...

Thanks @Chronial. We're closing in on the end of our Phase 7 work and looking to review and merge a big stack of enhancements in the next few weeks, and...

@DavidOry no need to apologize for not being on a call, we're trying to get better about collaborating asynchronously and not needing all our collaborators to join meetings constantly. I...

As you might notice from the source code here, I am also in the process of bringing Larch version 5 online, which provides explicit compatibility directly with `fit` and `predict`...

> @razorx89 thanks for opening the issue! > There is currently an open PR that I _think_ does exactly what you are suggesting: #114 Yep, #114 fixes this. You also...

At this time, the infrastructure to allow for op_skims has been merged into ActivitySim, but as yet there is no example model or test that implements the change.

> I'd just add that I agree with @dhensle suggestion to make the default behavior for condensing parameters false Looking at this again, I also agree `False` is the correct...

I test this, it seems to work. Thanks! One question: after I run the installer, I am not getting a shortcut to the ActivitySim environment appear in my start menu...