jplfaria

Agreed. Mostly because they integrated us and many other resources

Your guess is correct – I should have made that clearer. I am working with the following sources: - **rhea:** `https://w3id.org/biopragmatics/resources/rhea/rhea.owl.gz` - **eccode:** `https://w3id.org/biopragmatics/resources/eccode/eccode.owl` In these files, I also observed...

### Summary of Changes - **New TypeDef Added:** Introduced `HAS_TAXONOMIC_CLASSIFICATION` to capture the relationship between an ENA accession (representing a genome sequence) and the taxonomic classification assigned by SILVA. -...

@cthoyt I apologize, I just noticed I did something wrong, I see the warning: "Merging is blocked 1 review requesting changes by reviewers with write access. You're not authorized to...

@cthoyt thank you for the clarification. I thought that was the case, but my inexperience with git made me think I was doing something wrong.

@cthoyt, I apologize for the delay in responding. I have been buried in deadlines, and things only look to clear in mid-April. At that point, I can deep-dive into this,...

@matentzn, are there any updates on "community feedback" for this change? Is this issue the best place to provide feedback? I have been working to create ontology descriptions of other...

Any suggestions or guidance on a robust solution for this issue?