Jorrit Wronski

Hm, I just revisited the C++ code and we actually do the opposite of what I suggested. I guess it makes sense to maintain the output structure for backwards compatibility....

Yes, let us do that. I did not expect so much trouble here - sorry for the mess. It is a good idea to rethink this a bit more.

I restore the branch that was closed when merging https://github.com/CoolProp/CoolProp/pull/1932. Let us continue the work on this topic in https://github.com/CoolProp/CoolProp/pull/1959

[noblock] It looks like it uses CoolProp, but it not directly related. We could mention it on the homepage, but it should most likely hasve its own repo and user...

[noblock] OK, I guess you have a point. However, I would prefer to have CoolProp focus on the fluid properties and not the modelling of thermal systems. Thanks for the...