jostephd

> I really don't understand why they're colored The important thing about the coloring is that the color scale is reversed between the two lines: in the first line, 20...

> It's a regression in usability. We can argue whether more detailed statistics should be made available, but this presentation is not the way to go. Look at it. What...

> Have to second Vultraz (and nemaara and EoZ and whoever commented similarly on discord). I looked the window up on my recent play-throughs for some reason (I think I...

> Any data interpretation can be left for advanced stats or for people interested in it to just calculate it themselves. It's not possible to compute the p-values from the...

Another proposal: How about showing _either_ "Overall" _or_ "This turn", but not both at the same time?

Using the statistics in @nemaara's screenshot, that could look like this: | Hits (overall) | Inflicted | Taken | | -------------- | --------- | ----- | | Expected | 4.9...

Also, the "luck score" could be simplified by calculating it as probability of = in taken (this is just the calculation under the hood, not something we'd say in the...

> So for long games, -5%, 0%, +5% will probably be common to see if you use your overall campaign statistics. (Except for special exceptions.) Yes, that's how it is...

@Elvish-Hunter Thanks for the feedback. Happy to change the label to whatever people like, and we can put explanations in the tooltip (and/or in the in-game help). For example, we...

Good point, I agree: we don't want to present unnecessary information to casual players. And it's not just YW: TRoW and UtBS's start dates are "2 BW" and "300 AF"...