Johannes Röder
Johannes Röder
At the moment, this topic does not seem to be on the agenda of somebody. Or, shall we close this issue?
To be honest, I didn't understand exactly all what you wrote 😊 > Currently, it is not possible to combine an offset and an existing capacity when investing into a...
There was a reason putting the offset on the inflow, but I don't remember exactly. It may be that this matters only in the case, if `min=0`, than there could...
Yes, generally I also see it like that ... however, I would like to know at the same time know the total costs, if I use the emission values as...
No, it is not urgent, more a nice-to-have feature :) Yes, we could discuss this at the next meeting.
Summary -- questions: 1) _ underscore in the API reference could be misleading for users. 2) divide into experimental or not. Decisions: no, as you need to import from experimental...
I think just naming the oemof solph examples "oemof.solph" is fine as well. If there is just oemof.solph it might be more clear that oemof.solph is "just" one library of...
For examples using multiple packages, this would really make sense. Are there that many examples using multiple oemof packages? I am not sure if it makes sense for all examples....
> Maybe it is possible to offer a general approach with some common values of existing grids which pipes diameter are used for a certain capacity and temperature level /...
Hi, sorry for the late response. You can do that to a limited extend already directly with the tabular structure provided by DHNx. You can alternatively also extract the oemof-solph...