Johannes Röder

> > I'd suggest to have the documentation of an experimental bus/ link/ component within that category. The class documentation itself should state that it is experimental - optimally already...

> Concerning blocks in the API reference: Strictly speaking, blocks are not part of the API. When just these two options are possible, I'd rather make the blocks part of...

I am wondering: 1) how to avoid docstring duplications? Or rather reference docstring of ´Investment´ object? 2) I am implementing **kwargs ? Or didn't we want to avoid them?

Feedback from dev meeting: > 1. how to avoid docstring duplications? Or rather reference docstring of ´Investment´ object? Reference Investment class. For flow attributes, reference flow. > 2. I am...

Should the test be updated? (Remove all investment attributes from the test) This has partly be done. However, should there still be the options of "manually" putting the investment attribute...

Do we want to have consistent American English or British English?

> > > There is another error I found: > > https://github.com/oemof/oemof-solph/blob/34657e26d6646390febbdcfbf2be7bc75447a20a/src/oemof/solph/components.py#L668-L675 > > I can open a PR ... What is the error? The existing capacity is missing, it...

> > > Hey I found these lines: > > https://github.com/oemof/oemof-solph/blob/34657e26d6646390febbdcfbf2be7bc75447a20a/src/oemof/solph/components.py#L315-L320 > > Should they be there, as it is not the Storage Investment Block? So there is no investment....

Conclusion dev meeting (parallel session) - Definition facade: -> no additional constraints (-> this would be a new custum component) -> the facade must have some further (pre-) calculations for...

An issue that I won on the dev meeting for pushing it forward :) Actually, I have no idea how the structure in renpassGIS looks like. Generally, from the user...