José Carlos

I feel like there should be an attribute to prevent the materializer from setting unwanted properties. Something similar to `[IgnoreClientProperty]` but in the opposite direction.

@xuzhg Thankyou very much for your answer. Your proposal seems good to me, I will think about it and will likely submit a pull request. I have a question though:...

I've been attempting to implement this, but I've encountered a significant obstacle. The getter method's body cannot be translated at runtime because it is a compiled method, unlike `Expression` objects...

Should I add tests for this? If so, is there any existing file where I could add the tests or should I create a new one?

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

I fixed the code in order to pass those failed tests. Also, I found a third related issue: If you try to run this code It will throw Exception: ```cs...

Could I please receive any feedback from the review process? @habbes @wachugamaina @gathogojr @xuzhg Thanks in advance

Yes, adding the attribute to the interface properties "fixes" the issue. Unfortunately I cannot rely on this approach because I have multiple implementations for the same model, one for Sql...

@gathogojr Yes, adding the `OriginalName` attribute to the interface properties only also works. I cannot rely on that approach either though. I added tests regarding all the commented scenarios. Also,...

One week ago I was about to open an issue about PUID but then I found that it is a well known issue... So I found this PR and I...