Jonas Nyrup
Jonas Nyrup
I agree in changing the semantics of the current methods. Before brain storming about all the methods we could _add_, I'd like to flip the question to: what is the...
> To ease this transition I think we need methods they can switch to with names more closely matching the semantics. The core library doesn't need every method imaginable. The...
@eNeRGy164 I don't know what you're hinting at and I don't know any Asian languages, but I do know you usually have good points. Care to elaborate?
> Most Asian languages have no concept of upper or lowercase. So, you could argue that returning `true` is not correct. TIL - thanks! I think the viable path from...
> I like it, although it is a bit niche. What about you @jnyrup ? I'm also quite niche. I like set theory, so I've been waiting for years for...
I'm good with it.
> It would be great if these settings are not static. > > When executing tests in parallel they must not influence each other. I'm not sure what you're asking...
I like the proposal of having scoped formatters 👍 As the signature is `Formatter.ToString(object value, FormattingOptions options = null)` placing the scoped formatters on `FormattingOptions` might be a good place?...
Perhaps related to this idea: Use `[CallerArgumentExpression]` to retrieve the name of the subject at compile-time and populate this `Assertion` object with that. The idea is to remove the need...
Had a rather quick look at this and it looks very promising 🤩 Nothing caught my attention as being bad, regressing the current behavior or having pitfalls.