Jenna Makowski

> Thanks for this PR! in addition to the specific items listed, could you please add a top level README.rst for this app that explains what the purpose of the...

@mariajgrimaldi This is a tCRIL funded projected (not an edX Blended Dev project). The code is FC-0005

> Hey @jmakowski1123 what do you think of this feature. I think that currently it is very annoying to have to know the name of the organization, there is a...

@arbrandes @pdpinch Just noting the parallel ticket I'm working on here to try and get as much product-oriented data as possible for these. Each MFE has a ticket now on...

@juancamilom @santiagosuarezedunext @ali-hugo @itsjeyd Just noting that this is an exemplar ticket and is demonstrating exactly how we want the product review process to work. The original proposal has already...

> Hi @ihor-romaniuk, > > I think having the organisation name in the sidebar works well on desktop, but I wonder if it is too far down on the page...

This is fine from a product pov

Hi @dyudyunov , Hi @mariajgrimaldi Thanks for this contribution! I agree with @mariajgrimaldi , that this PR is proposing a behavior change to the platform, rather than fixing a bug....

Status update: 1/31 - On hold for review across platform for consistent UI. Timeline TBD.

Since this ticket requires deeper edX product input, I've created a Product Feature ticket [here ](https://github.com/openedx/platform-roadmap/issues/238)to track continued product communications and feedback.