Jeremy Lainé

@msoxzw I'm going to close this, CI consistently fails

Hello, do you still plan to add the missing tests?

Closing in favour of #477

Hi @msoxzw I'm trying to work my way through outstanding PRs and came upon this one. From re-reading the conversation it sounded as though we were waiting for things to...

> I don't see any sign of the upstream CPython changes happening. Should we close this PR?

Superseeded by #393

I don't plan on merging this as-is as I can see this leading to a proliferation of options for allowing / blocking not only interfaces but specific addresses. Another option...

In the light of @mariokrous's feedback I'm tmpted to close this issue.

Do you think we could enable runs of the workflow for pull requests too? For instance, for my PR #19 which adds an `aiortc` client: I'd like to also include...

> > Do you think we could enable runs of the workflow for pull requests too? > > Sure done. Hm, maybe this wasn't such a great idea after all....