Jarmo Kikstra
Jarmo Kikstra
Note that #188 already implements a few, but kept it to Maybe we want multiple labels? - EDGAR - IPCC1996 - IPCC2006 Note: also consider labels for: - "Used for...
Okay sounds good, just let me know if/when you need anything from me.
Question about sectors under `Final Energy|Transportation`, and consistency with `Emission` sectors.
> > Could we consider either adopting a more AR6-like structure under `Final Energy|Transportation`, or at least have some aggregated variable corresponding to road transport (and preferably also aviation and...
@orichters that looks really great! Indeed, I see this causing headaches for ScenarioMIP and it would be great if this will be taken up. I really support the idea of...
> @dc-almeida could you review this correction for IMAGE? probably better for @VassilisDaioglou :)
Would be great to harmonize it. But also let's not hold up the emissions PR (which would be very welcome already right now; #255) because of the energy variables (where...
Sure, Tier 2 or Tier 3 here seems to make sense, indeed not Tier 1 (given it is in its infancy, I would this does not seem essential).
I assume anyone from @IAMconsortium/common-definitions-energy can answer this. Would be good if it is clarified in the descriptions. And I assume adding additional subsector variables should be possible. To not...
Species: all except CO2 (until someone will submit something where they did actively model a non-CO2 removal technology, and then we change that species) Years: all