Jarmo Kikstra

> I am not sure it has been resolved already, but I think AWB is purely anthropogenic which would be OK to be reported under AFOLU. My main point is...

Good notes, good notes. My suspicion is that some would even report it under 'Final Energy|Industry'. @volker-krey I believe the WG made someone responsible for the overall final energy tree...

Hi @orichters, could this fall under a variable: "Emissions|*|AFOLU|Biomass Burning"? (my understanding is that this is the same as "Agricultural Waste Burning")

Thanks Zeb. I will incorporate these points above and update later. > > Yes, definitely a challenge! My feeling is this: the AR6 workflow will put us in the right...

Hey @znicholls, didn't mean to rock the boat / startle you. Just relaying first impressions - but nothing decided yet. I just spoke also to a few more people, some...

Looks good to me, @znicholls. I spoke to Keywan about the following timeline (now also added to the first post). He thinks that this would work really well: > >...

> > In FaIR and MAGICC, we only have two sectors in CO2, and 1 sector for all other species. > > For CO2, should we go with: > >...

In the first submission, none of the modelling teams reported "Fossil Fuel Fires". Unless anyone shouts (@IAMconsortium/common-definitions-emissions), I suggest we move it under "Energy" as "Emissions|{species}|Energy|Fossil Fuel Fires"

Maybe it has been reported by (some?) IAMs before, but I am not aware of that. And for CMIP6, for emissions harmonization, it was classified under "Energy Sector" too. Looks...

Yeah - will all shoot off a quick email to @ssmithClimate just out of curiosity on why CEDS reports it like this, then we should be sure.