Jithin Emmanuel

cc @adong @OronNadiv

cc @adong Maybe we need to batch the requests ?

Also we should have an API which just takes pipeline ID

We have a data retention policy 30 days. Hence I don't think we are seeing this issue because of our cleanup.

@CatWithNineLives Thank you for your interest. I just assigned this to you. Please checkout out contribution guide https://docs.screwdriver.cd/about/contributing/index#general-guidelines-for-contributing Happy coding 👍

Is the issue that UI is computing incorrect event status ? Running should take precedence over aborted. cc @adong

I think projects in sonarqube's permission can be controller, we might be making it public for all. Need to handle separately for private repositories. cc @tkyi

@kumada626 @tk3fftk I believe this can be solved by making project permissions `Private` https://docs.sonarqube.org/latest/project-administration/project-existence/ We used to do that before, but then we removed that option. https://github.com/screwdriver-cd/coverage-sonar/pull/41#pullrequestreview-456159325 https://github.com/screwdriver-cd/coverage-sonar/blame/7f3c20727d9d5ddcf951e8e53a48a7f7ff6710fa/index.js#L32 Perhaps what...

@tk3fftk I don't think we should do any sync. All we can do is when creating a sonarqube project we can mark it as private if Git repository is private....

It's not possible to prevent scanner from sending coverage info, since coverage calculation happens on sonar server. This is the response we got from SonarQube support as well. ``` It...