John Högberg
John Högberg
Thanks for your report, I've opened a draft PR #8902 for `maint` that restores the old behavior specifically for this argument. I figured that it's better to do so than...
Sorry for the late reply, I've been swamped with bugs. We haven't come to a decision on this yet.
> @jhogberg, Any updates on this? Do you think you can squeeze it in OTP 28? As mentioned in the issue, the window for 28 was closed before you opened...
> When do you think 28.1 will be released? Sorry for the late reply -- I missed the notification. 28.1 will be released early this autumn (September-ish).
> @jhogberg, I've rebased to master. I'm hoping you can accept patches for OTP 28.1 now? 28.1 would be `maint`, it should be relatively easy to rebase to that though...
> I've rebased to maint and changed the PR base from master to maint as well. It looks like you dragged some unrelated commits into it. > I think namespacing...
> @jhogberg Do you plan not to pursue this right now in favour of your planned changes? Sorry, I’ve had to put everything on ice and am not working much...
> About the formatting, I reformatted the functions I was working on with Emacs' `c-fill-paragraph`. I'll revert the changes. Do you have a configuration for better formatting? I believe the...
Not at the moment, maint is still the right branch. It’s been tested briefly without anything fishy showing up, and it’ll get some more testing after 28.3 is released this...
Merged, thanks for the PR!