John Högberg

> @jhogberg does this sound like something that could work for your needs? Yes, we're happy as long as we can tell it to only work with vendored dependencies and...

> I see that you wrote: "No complaints from dialyzer!" > > As I see, `stack(A) :: [A] | []`. The function returns `[]` and this is part of the...

> Changing the first clause to return `?nil` is, most likely, the wrong thing to do. [No time to explain why.] I would very much like to hear why that's...

> If the proper way of being convinced about something technical and doing changes these days is for people to voice (naive or uneducated) opinions (like those in the issue's...

> @jhogberg : I did not refer to your post in any explicit way; I only referred to posts that (in my view, at least) express opinions, so I do...

> > No, what you're looking for is `t_nonempty_list/1` (`[A,...]` in the type lang). > > Thank you for pointing this out! Now I (finally!) see what you are/were referring...

> The implementation looks relatively straightforward. I have looked at the stack dump related code within the process_dump routines in otp source. With the experience I got on #5305 I...

> Does it keep compatibility with existing hot code loading semantic? > Previously, executing `code:load` for module implementing `gen_server` behaviour resulted in an immediate change. Yes, the funs refer to...

> So `Mod:handle_cast(Request, State)` is, after `HandleCast = fun Mod:handle_cast/2` slower than `HandleCast(Request, State)` ?? Yes. > Is it the `fun()` creation time that it is worth the work to...

Sure, feel free to make a PR. :)