JHEMCU
JHEMCU
So is it ready to merge?
@andyp1per @peterbarker See see?
Thanks all.
You are right. The only difference is the gyroscope...but I think the current compilation system cannot support the #ifdef operation.
> here is a diff of the two, (some are not different, just different alignment). > > i wonder if only updating the existing to include the gyro is more...
> @jhemcu have you submited samples already? @mmosca Not yet, please provide the post address.
> @jhemcu 可以准确地说，AIO和非AIO之间的唯一差异是添加的内置ESC，而非AIO具有额外的UARTS？否则，它是同一功能的完全相同的引脚吗？ Yes, the non-AIO version has UART4 6 7 8 added, but no ESC, everything else is the same. #define USE_UART4 #define UART4_RX_PIN PC11 #define UART4_TX_PIN PC10 #define...
Sure, write the JHEMCUF405 target in the INAV firmware list ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "iNavFlight/inav" ***@***.***>; 发送时间: 2025年1月24日(星期五) 中午11:12 ***@***.***>; ***@***.******@***.***>; 主题: Re: [iNavFlight/inav] Inav target request for JHEMCU F405 NOXE V2 (Issue #10338)...