Jan Petter Maehlen
Jan Petter Maehlen
Yes, that sounds good.
@agerwick, I am moving this to a later release milestone. Need to make a v1.0.2 release very soon - there has been an accumulation of small bugs in the batch-processing...
I guess we can conclude that the `make_summary` method needs to be updated: - [ ] #315 and this issue: more flexibility wrt sending arguments to the method - [...
Adding support for Python 3.12 requires some work on the `OtherPath` object since it builds on `pathlib` that had a major upgrade going from Python 3.11 to Python 3.12. Should...
Closing it for now - will reopen it soon when we start making the necessary changes in `OtherPaths` for supporting py3.12
Hi. I have updated the biologic reader a bit.
@Ozzstein - take a look at [issue 191](https://github.com/jepegit/cellpy/issues/191). Maybe we should make sure that cellpy reads the most relevant "names" from the .conf file (prms)?
Released v.0.3.0 so this has to be a minor updated (e.g. v.0.3.1)
Yes, agree. Data governance is important. Using the config to set the "dataframe backend" sounds like a good idea. And maybe it also open up future possibilities of letting users...
the CI check at appveyor failed for python 3.9. Most likely a dependency that has been updated that does not support python3.9. Might need to pin dependency. I will check.