jenniferward
jenniferward
In music manuscripts when you link up to a collection record in 773, catalogers can choose a collection record from _any_ library. This can lead to mistakenly linking to a...
We'd like a more refined validation for the field 100$a in the templates. This is for Composer/Author, i.e. composer in notated music but author for libretti and treatises. Currently there...
Here is something for a far-off wish list: Once you create a parent record, it would be convenient to create an individual entry that is derived from this parent record...
There is an error when you switch templates in Muscat. If you switch from a single manuscript to an individual entry in a printed edition collection, then holdings are created...
If I delete a 210$a in Secondary literature, then the linking remains in Sources. Example: `LutzenbergerP n.d. ` was deleted from https://muscat-test.rism.info/admin/publications/30025602 but we can see that the 14 linked...
If a Subject Heading is merged through the Subject Headings authority file, a duplicate 650 can potentially be created in the source record. Example: https://muscat.rism.info/admin/sources/1001037282/edit had both `Volkslied` and `Folk...
RISM beginners sometimes have trouble with the incipit numbers (031 $a-c). They might put all the numbers in $a (such as 1.1.1 or variations thereof) or maybe fill out only...
It is possible to put records in a folder that belong to both the cataloger's working group and an external working group, published or unpublished. Folder owners see a "publish"...
Currently, all terms entered into the field 650$a, whether in a Source record or in the Secondary Literature, end up in one index: https://muscat.rism.info/admin/standard_terms This is problematic for the users...
For 530: - [ ] Please add new subfield $g and call it `Note` (similar to the note field in 787) - [ ] Please add these relationships to $i...