Jeffrey Paul

@Sidsector9 @dkotter what else is needed to get this PR open for review (and then merged and ready for release)?

New opt-in filter/setting seems like a good approach as well, in no way looking to introduce a breaking change without a user taking an educated action to trigger that change.

@Sidsector9 checking back in to see if you're able to get this ready for review/merge?

@Sidsector9 can you please update the changelog entry in the PR description (I added the credit line folks), thanks!

@lkraav could you help provide a use case where this would be useful? If I'm understanding your request correctly, then I'm unable to foresee a scenario where I'd want to...

@lkraav after internal discussion, our intention is to keep the functionality of Restricted Site Access as-is in relation to this issue. We'll work to update our documentation and readme files...

Part of this has been resolved with updates in v1.1.1, but will need some more testing/updates that will come in a future release. So I'll punt this to v1.2.0 in...

This issue still has the final item remaining to be resolved, so anyone with InDesign installed who can help test would be greatly appreciated!: - [ ] test importing Classic...

Input from @ivankruchkoff: > I think based on some research that we can do something like: ``` Caption for the image ``` > Some engineering references for whoever might pick...

@refsland @xLesy if either/both of you want to upload a ZIP of those file changes or link to a GH repo then we could look to pull from there in...