Jeff Parsons

Comment/question from the peanut gallery: As an outsider, it can be hard to understand the outcome of a vote, even with minutes recorded. In particular, sometimes when an objection is...

> Unanimous consent can normally be blocked without setting any bar on how "valid" the reason is [...] Oh, for sure, that makes sense. I certainly wouldn't advocate for that,...

Probably related: https://github.com/Boscop/web-view/issues/280

@ssmith22 I've just confirmed that the fix from https://github.com/Boscop/web-view/issues/280 works for me on Ubuntu 20.10, after having the equivalent OS package update break it for me today.

Summarising to make sure I've understood correctly: - `NegInt` should have been called `SignedInt` or something like that, because that's what it actually represents in the underlying Smithy model. However,...

How about `ExtantFile` and `ExtinctFile`?  ツ In all seriousness, though, I noticed this, too. A few alternative antonym pairs—most of which aren't all that brilliant, either—for the sake of getting a...

To be explicit, each of those could give us, for example > `FileSystemResource` = `ExistentResource` ∪ `NonexistentResource`, > where `ExistentResource` = `File` ∪ `Directory` ∪ `Link` instead of the current...

I'm surprised at how ok `Existing` / `Unused` feels, given that I wouldn't normally encounter them as polar opposites. Oh well, why fight it if it feels good? Brainstorm continues...

I hadn't looked at `ConcreteResource.linkedResource`, so I wrongly assumed that `linkedResource` was only applicable in the case of a `Link`, so it might therefore throw an exception or something equally...

> BTW, its amazing to see how willing to discuss all this you guys are. Can I second that? I really appreciate this. I'm sure there are plenty of pros...