Gregory Jefferis

Would be happy to see this on CRAN. Would there be any sense in producing an ITK only package. Could be useful for others and could help re space. Of...

> One note on style: It looks like a lot of the undocumented functions were > intended to be subroutines in documented functions but were put outside the > brackets....

@dblodgett-usgs did you get anywhere with this in the end? I am in the same boat with a coveralls history. Thanks!

OK! Thanks for confirming.

Dear Andrew, I realised I dropped the ball on responding to an earlier query on this. Your implementation looks neat and is along the lines of what I was thinking...

On 10 Nov 2015, at 08:15, Gabriele Baldassarre [email protected] wrote: > Uhm...I installed the package today, so I'm sure I have the latest version. I get the same result as...

Hi Tal, I think that removing the option is not what I would have done, because I think there are good reasons to want the behaviour that was implied by...

Hi Tal, I was thinking a bit more about this. I'm not sure that the present argument names are very clear. I was trying to think what might be better...

Hi Tal, Thank you very much for this invitation. When I have something I'll prob still do a PR. I agree that is essential that the function's default behaviour matches...

Thank you very much for the v quick response @gaborcsardi! More context here https://github.com/r-spatial/s2/issues/79#issuecomment-712812605.