Jeff Barczewski

Great idea! I will put this on my list. Thank for the idea.

@bbthorntz Thanks, that reminds me that I need to update redux-logic-test's peer deps so they are broader. I'm guessing that in the original test, one would have to wait slightly...

@bbthorntz I've updated your original test with redux-mock-store to have it wait for actions to complete. See it here https://codesandbox.io/s/olplx0l4vy

I hadn't seen it before, but it looks to be pretty comparable. You should be fine to use either.

I'm not familiar with the change can you elaborate on what you are concerned with?

@6a68 yes, I like to keep up as best I can with tracking joi. So we can release a new one here as soon as we figure out how to...

I guess we have two options here: 1. create a new joi-date-extensions-browser 2. create pre-bundled version with or without the date extensions In weighing the consequences, it seems like maybe...

Yeah, I was having trouble with it. I might need other people's help to figure out what is going on. Basically when I try to use it using the BaseJoi.extend(JoiDateExtension)...

I have joi-date-extensions-browser repo up now and I have a buildable example which reproduces the error. If any of you would mind taking a look to see if you have...

@Marsup figured out that the webpack config was loading multiple instances of joi thus causing the problem in joi-date-extensions-browser/example/with-ext but I cannot determine what is wrong. In analyzing joi-browser and...