Jeff Barczewski

Yes, you can easily modify the request headers using the beforeHooks. You would modify the `all.requestOptions` object specifically the `headers` property of `all.requestOptions`. It accepts anything that `request` takes https://github.com/request/request#readme...

Yes, you should only need to auth at the beginning of each flow. Each iteration will contain its own cookie jar so it won't conflict with other concurrent iterations. Any...

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Yes it would be possible, maybe we'd add a beforeEach and afterEach hooks that would run immediately before and after each...

Thanks Scott. I don't currently have a way to do polling in the flow. The hooks API is synchronous so it doesn't have a way to poll. I did create...

@sellis I guess that might be a possibility. Let me go down that route and see if that will work.

@apchamberlain Thanks! I appreciate it. I had thought about having a limit for N number of requests, but I like your idea of being able to specify rate over time....

Yes, I think that is a good approach, I'm thinking about the best way to implement. I'm thinking that Rx might be a good way to throttle, but I'm still...

@bapti I believe it wouldn't be that hard to add, since I would just need to adjust the async queue.concurrency manually over time rather than just kicking off with the...

@bapti Excellent, if you get stuck let me know. You can send me a pull request when ready. Yes, it is an great idea to hook this up to CI...

It looks like it is a phantomjs-prebuilt problem since the tests cause the same error, so I have logged the issue https://github.com/Medium/phantomjs/issues/478