Justin Chadwell

@aluzzardi I think that's definitely a legitimate failure, but I *think* this is likely different, that error message looks quite different from what we see in https://dagger.cloud/dagger/traces/3add32bb1a460bde62b9ccbbfd25d0ca?span=4e373cd85ec633b2&logs#4e373cd85ec633b2:L1542 (love the permalinking...

@vito if we do away with the pubsub, does that break `dagger watch`? No objections, just wanted to make sure I understand :heart:

I think this is expected - suppose the following module structure: - Module A starts (running a container) - Module A calls a function in Module B - Module B...

Adding this to the v0.12.0 milestone since by that release we should probably either: - Remove this flag - Ensure that nested execs don't count towards max-parallelism As is, with...

x-linking to https://github.com/dagger/dagger/issues/6465 as well.

Bleh, shifting this one out of the milestone - I think we've got some rough consensus to take option 2 in https://github.com/dagger/dagger/issues/6894#issuecomment-2025654478, which is actually a backwards compatible change, so...

#9395 should give us a neat way to implement this without needing layers of buildkit changes.

I'm kind of interested into diving into what the NFS mounts are going to be used for :eyes: - is it for avoiding the expensive context transfer of files? -...

Hm, interested to hear @sipsma's thoughts as well, but I'm not entirely convinced on the value of splitting these out. That said, I don't really see any *huge* harm in...

These are also potentially legitimate issues: - `TestPythonProjectLayout` - https://github.com/dagger/dagger/issues/7662 - `TestGoInit` - https://github.com/dagger/dagger/issues/8031 - `TestGit` - not seen this one, do you have a link? The first two seem...