Julien Danjou
Julien Danjou
> > There is no way I could review this TBH, it's been so long. I'm ok to approve and merge it though as I don't want to block any...
I think the root problem is that the project is barely maintained at this stage. All the people who worked on Gnocchi years ago and wrote most of that code...
Yes if you have changes that can be extracted, do this, that'll help for sure!
I'm failing to see how this is a problem in tenacity itself and not in the so called exception though
Right; I'd rather change the log line to not have a final `.` but using something like `{verb}: {e}`
Sounds like a good idea.
@hasier is this something we could avoid breaking or should I just bump to version 9?
Backports are not automatically updated in any way and that's not something we're planning to do. Best case would be to be able to recreate a backport, which would work...
Hi @HaruChebrolu, There are no label conditions in your configuration above. I imagine you want to add one? In that case you'd need: ```yaml pull_request_rules: - name: automatic merge conditions:...
A good question for @HaruChebrolu would be: what are you trying to implement/achieve in term of workflow? As in, what's the problem with the current rule that you have?