John Wilkinson

Thank you!! I look forward to checking it out once I have some free time!

Pending soon, once `v0.1.0` has been confirmed to be stable in prod for some time we'll push it up to `v1.0.0` to indicate it's feature complete (at least as far...

Hi @jeremysmithco ! Thanks so much for the interest. We have https://github.com/doximity/simplekiq/pull/19 in the works which will help a bit with the dependency specificity, but when I have some time...

@jeremysmithco yep I think you've got it right, and I agree that's not ideal. Thanks for the specifics, stay tuned!

@jeremysmithco hi, following up a million months later - `v0.1.0` should cover you, let me know if any issues. We're ramping up for the 1.0 release but wanted to give...

Hi @jeremysmithco - we had a good amount of discussion about this internally as the ask dovetails with some unrelated sidekiq-oriented code from another part of the company which may...

Just ran into this too, would love it if someone shared a workaround if they found it... It's odd because the git blame on that line seems to say it's...

Not sure what's up with that failure, seems intermittent maybe? Looks like it's having trouble downloading some ruby version.

@dblock - Ok, I added specs to cover the array usage. Before I make an entry in the CHANGELOG and README.md though, there's a problem though that I need advice...

Well, you can still present an array of resources... It's actually exactly the same you just can't write a representer for the array itself, so if you want to make...