Juan Benet
Juan Benet
@hannahhoward I merged this all in #605 -- I'll leave this PR open for the discussion, feel free to close when relevant.
Hey! thanks for this @msporny -- i think this could work well for everybody. Would be good to coordinate parameters/expectations for success before launching into that work? Then again, Multihash...
@pawal having the same numbers as IANA would be nice, but this wont work for us, as our table is going to grow well beyond that one, include historical hashes...
Also, worth mentioning, i have been in contact with people at the IETF and IANA and they do not have a problem with us NOT using that table.
sorry for the months delay on review
this should probably modify the table? see https://github.com/jbenet/multihash/pull/12
Thanks great point. I had missed the internal state discussion and just labeled `sha3`. I've been using sha3-512: https://github.com/jbenet/go-multihash/blob/master/sum.go#L67-L71 and not sure if people have been using it. so i...
@ivilata great sounds good. could you file a PR against this repo with code table updates you see fit?
@ivilata sorry for the months delay on review. > (besides maybe adopting sha3 as a deprecated name for sha3-512 i think we SHOULD keep sha3-512, as thats' what's been established...
This was an issue about giving implementors guidelines on how to make it easy for users to replace the table with a custom one, or just a newer version of...