Juan Benet
Juan Benet
Okay, the bindings _work_ now. I've now transferred hundreds of gigs over it and it (seems to) work fine. - need benchmarks to see how it stacks up against TCP...
> Why do you want to tunnel TCP over UDP? Just to have reliability over the UDP channels `nattywad` provides :) How do you do it now?
Ok good, we're on the same page then. Had thought for a second you had some other reliability in place in the meantime. Ok, I'll begin integrating `go-natty` and `go-udtwrapper`...
maybe we can update go-natty or nattywad to expose an optional `UDTConn`... Actually this is going to be trickier than I thought, ad the `go-udtwrapper` does its own low level...
@oxtoacart perfect. I'll dig in later this week
Success! In record 10 minutes, I added UDT support to `go-netcatnat` (which uses go-natty and waddell). You can see it in branch udt: https://github.com/jbenet/go-netcatnat/commit/5fb5a414e2cb5f6f1fb073de84c35aec1fa6a194 cc @maybebtc :heart: all our things...
> We should all hop on a call at some point Yes, let's do it. have time this week? my email is on my github profile. > watched your sourcegraph...
:+1:
Has this been done? would be useful to have a line on the readme specifying which spec is implemented.
cc @diasdavid