James M Snell

Then please consider this input to the loaders work and feel free to do with this issue as you will.

> do you plan adding MacOS support at this point? Very soon yes. I also want to see if there's a way on windows to provide more of the non-cpu...

Yeah, moving targets are never fun. I'm +1 on this.

@MylesBorins ... how would you feel about an approach that used two lookup tables in CI... one with a last-known-good configuration of modules, and one with the current-set? Running differentials...

Key difference is the additional support of both hex and base32 and a simpler interface (no options argument with the ability to add other encoding options later)

Likely in March. And there's no rush on getting this PR landed. I wanted to at least open the discussion

It's both. Our current implementation and the types aren't 100%. I can say it's being worked on actively as we speak. Can't say exactly when we'll have it delivered in...

Just getting back to this. I'll investigate further to see what is possible here.

I'm happy to add support for this in the Node.js implementation also. So +1 on it.

Just to offer a different perspective on this... in Node.js (which is, of course, a different environment than browsers) we have more of a notion of objects that can be...