Jason R. Coombs
Jason R. Coombs
Sounds reasonable to me. Can you draft a fix?
That seems like invalid input to me. What would you expect when pluralizing a phrase?
> could you please explain why it's is not raising the error in the first run and raising in the second run, there is no much difference in the input...
In my experience, if a name is addressing two concerns (i.e. `PyO3` and `version`), it's often wise to actually model those concerns separately, similar to how `__spec__` models details about...
Thanks for the report. It seems you've reported two different issues, so let's focus on one at a time. Let's keep this one for double-s, and create a new one...
On further consideration, I'm not sure the reported issue is a bug. This project doesn't always detect invalid inputs. In the examples above, one is passing plural nouns into `plural_noun`,...
> One question, why the plural functions always return `str` while singular ones return `str` or `False`? Shouldn't all return the same type, either only str or both? I don't...
In my opinion, since it's language feature that's been extensively discussed and deemed supported by consensus, default linter settings should be lenient to that position. It feels a bit tyrannical...
> [tools] cannot know that `i` is bound Indeed, and using the variable in the loop doesn't help. Modifying your example slightly: ```python from collections.abc import Iterable def foo(it: Iterable[int])...
Please consider contributing this to [jaraco/jaraco.abode](/jaraco/jaraco.abode).