Jason R. Coombs

> Do we know why this issue wasn't picked up by build bots? I guess because [there's no "sunos" buildbot](https://buildbot.python.org/).

I don't fully understand the motivations behind `_fd_dir_for_pipe_targets`. I'm not sure when `/proc` or `/dev` is relevant. The proposed patch seems reasonable, although I'd like to see it protected by...

> > Do we know why this issue wasn't picked up by build bots? > > I guess because [there's no "sunos" buildbot](https://buildbot.python.org/). Oh! It does fail in the Solaris...

I'm pleased to say, CoPilot was able to implement fully the fix, including submitting the PR, based on the discussion above.

It's still missing step 4 of [add mappings](https://github.com/reubano/csv2ofx#adding-mappings). Also, you'll want to use ruff to format and static check the code (`ruff format` and `ruff check --fix` may work to...

I'm closing this as it's languished for a while. Feel free to follow up and we can re-open, or re-submit a new PR with the requested changes.

Since our last discussion, I've encountered other use-cases where it's been valuable not to have to specify a name or a version for a package. I was troubleshooting a case...

Urged by pradyunsg at PyCon sprints, I'm revisiting this issue. I've gone back and re-read #2329 and re-reviewed #2817 (which originally implemented stricter validation but which I disabled). I'm tempted...

> It seems to me that together these 2 factors (existence of `pyproject.toml` and calling an installer on the directory) are evidence enough that the user intentionally wants to build...

As far as I know, no, this library doesn't provide any color or formatting support. I'd be happy for this library to host such behavior. Feel free to elaborate on...