Jason R. Coombs

This issue has affected me on multiple occasions when invoking black on functions that use `noqa: C901` ([example](https://github.com/jaraco/inflect/runs/7593426634?check_suite_focus=true)). Interestingly, the issue seems not to manifest on later Pythons, so the...

Oh, and it looks like the issue is even more complicated. [This run](https://github.com/jaraco/inflect/runs/7593492753?check_suite_focus=true) indicates that putting the noqa comment after the open parenthesis isn't adequate in some cases. It turned...

Aha, so I tried with my main user account (jaraco) and that worked. Probably the issue is that `bb-migration` user isn't admin on the org/repo. Perhaps we should extend the...

Github side. Yes, better would be to detect the necessary conditions directly.

I have some commits in [this tree](/jaraco/bitbucket_issue_migration/tree/archive/retry-on-rate-limit-1). I'll plan to rebase those after #77 lands.

I wonder if this issue affects other non-module plugins like pytest-checkdocs or pytest-mypy.

I tried adding `pytest-randomly` to `jaraco.text`, which uses a number of other pytest plugins, and it worked just fine: ``` jaraco.text main $ tox python develop-inst-noop: /Users/jaraco/code/main/jaraco.text python installed: attrs==22.1.0,black==22.6.0,click==8.1.3,coverage==6.4.2,docutils==0.19,filelock==3.7.1,flake8==4.0.1,importlib-metadata==4.12.0,iniconfig==1.1.1,jaraco.context==4.1.2,jaraco.functools==3.5.1,-e...

@tholo I'm happy to help maintain this package. Feel free to add me as a backup maintainer/owner (mainly here and PyPI). I'd prefer owner access in order to ensure continuity...

> but what is the purpose of the package? This comment is off-topic and superseded by #79.

See jaraco/pytest-checkdocs#9 and jaraco/pytest-perf#5 for approaches I used to fix this issue.