Isuru Fernando

What's the reason for having this package? How would someone consume this package? Also what's the point of this when there's OpenJDK 8 already in conda-forge?

> How would you consume such a package? > Before installing the package you would install the encumbered software in the legally prescribed way. Then you would install the conda...

That's not an illustrative example at all. Can you please describe in detail why you need an empty oracle jdk conda package? How and what would it accomplish anything that...

> Wouldn’t it be better to keep publishing openmp as a proxy for llvm-openmp for backwards compatibility? There are still plenty of packages depending on it. We published for version...

PRs are always welcome to add windows builds to pytorch.

> Of course**. But isn't the underlying issue here that conda-forge's mkl [depends](https://github.com/conda-forge/intel_repack-feedstock/blob/master/recipe/meta.yaml#L91-L106) on intel-openmp? That's because of pytorch. If we have a pytorch windows build, then we can make...

See https://github.com/archspec/archspec/issues/24

> In general, I think it's really iffy to have static and shared builds of the same libs in the same host environment. Having static and shared builds in the...

> IIUC correctly, only the shared builds would have CMake metadata. I dislike this because we'd be "lying" to any consuming feedstock that requests libxyz-static and happens to use CMake,...

> I gave two examples in the OP, zstd & libprotobuf (the latter has no cmake integration on unix yet). Lots of feedstocks that are consuming those are CMake-based. If...