Silvan Mosberger

Please also check out #143!

RFCSC: This RFC has not acquired enough shepherds. This typically shows lack of interest from the community. In order to progress [a full shepherd team is required](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/#shepherd-team). Consider trying to...

(discussed in today's docs team meeting) Overall we agree with the intention of the RFC, many terms could be improved and used more consistently. But we think that the RFC...

RFCSC: This RFC is being closed due to lack interest. If enough shepherds are found this issue can be reopened. If you don't have permission to reopen please [open an...

@AndersonTorres There are no shepherds right now but three are required. (While I would be a good candidate, I'm a bit overbooked right now, so I'd prefer to only give...

RFCSC: @wolfgangwalther: Asking again, would you be willing to shepherd this RFC? Furthermore, we're also nominating @Atemu as a shepherd, since you recently reviewed it, sound good?

This RFC has not acquired enough shepherds. This typically shows lack of interest from the community. In order to progress [a full shepherd team is required](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/#shepherd-team). Consider trying to raise...

> Try out developing this RFC in a dedicated repository (I'm generally not a fan of making that the default for our process, but in this case it looks like...

I'm nominating myself to be a shepherd for this RFC I am (currently) against this change, with the main reason being that I don't think this is the right solution...

While my proposal isn't in conflict with this RFC, it does solve the same problem and would therefore obviate the need for this RFC (which is fairly intrusive due to...