Sergey Kolbasov

In comparison, in fs2 this case is handled correctly: https://scastie.scala-lang.org/d39dX6ylQ7q4x6mGLSWaxQ ```scala import fs2.* import cats.effect.* import cats.effect.kernel.Resource.ExitCase import cats.effect.unsafe.implicits.global Stream(List(1, 2, 3), List(4, 5)) .evalTap(list => IO(println(s"Input list: $list"))) .flatMap(list...

Hi there I guess, it would be nice and meaningful to have behaviour similar to what Finagle did for their client. - [Watermark](https://twitter.github.io/finagle/guide/Clients.html#pooling) connection pool with lower and higher marks...

@jrudolph Yes, but no Watermark connection pool is just one of mechanics for a pooling when you have minimal and maximal amount of connections in pool, and as far as...

Hello Yes, however, this project needs some attention to update documentation first. I'll try to come back to it as soon as possible.

For that, I would need somehow drag this parameter down to `Negotiable` through: - `Compile` - `Output.outputToResponse` - `Negotiable.apply` So I found it more natural to use a type instead,...

Also, users don't explicitly enable Content-Type negotiation with some boolean parameter but use `Coproduct` on `CT` type at the moment. That's another argument why 406 should be enabled through the...

The idea about `serveOr406` sounds interesting indeed

So, what shall be the next step? Do we agree on the idea?

Thanks, @Avasil! There is also PR #1098 built on top of `Iterant`. I wonder if we can unite them under the same module.

@vkostyukov nice to hear it! I'll do my best to move finch to v1.0 In the end, our team is kinda interested in stable API :smile: