Rudi Grinberg

Wait, my bad. I initially thought you were referring to the problem on the server side. In which case we already use the finalizer appropriately. My suggestion above would improve...

What would be the advantage? The parser is not part of the public interface and requires no additional dependencies. The only gain would be to shave off the size of...

Alright, feel free to send a PR that moves the parser into a separate library (within the same package) if you really need this.

> I think the benefit here would be the ability to share those type representations across the ecosystem Is this benefit not already realized? > If this is not as...

Sure there's a bit of redundancy but I claim that it's mostly harmless. OCaml binaries aren't very nimble after all. By the way, give our http parser a try. It's...

@dsheets is this done?

@magv I wouldn't mind mentioning this but this is really an Lwt specific thing so I'd like to see what's their documentation on this subject.

I will investigate the EMFILE issue. In the meantime, if you'd like to help out it would be nice to see if the issue is reproducible with Async. I can...

As for FreeBSD, I have no experience with that fine OS so contributions describing what's necessary would be very welcome. On 08/17, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > [Lwt's docs](https://ocsigen.org/lwt/2.5.2/manual/) do mention...

We should probably just be using `send_file` in this case. At least where it's available. Since you are knowledgeable on this topic. What would you recommend?