Joshua MacDonald

@katiehockman Correct--I should have said something like "allowed to choose not to implement an optional feature as opposed to a breaking change or a major version number change".

EasyCLA is also causing technical difficulties. Here is a PR that is blocked by EasyCLA where every commit except dependabot passes EasyCLA: https://github.com/open-telemetry/experimental-arrow-collector/pull/6

@jaronoff97 This topic came up (again) in today's technical committee meeting. We want to enable progress and unblock this effort, so that can begin treating github access permissions as code...

Welcome @pegasas. Invite should have arrived.


Related work, cc @bogdandrutu @kalyanaj https://github.com/w3c/trace-context/issues/550

@carlosalberto I think we should try to build in more protection against accidental propagation of the peer service information. Also, I'm afraid "upstream" can lead to confusion--although unless we do...

FYI I would like to merge this for the record. Thank you @spencerwilson!!

Generally, this suggests that the input source file (i.e, the old version) is not exactly the same as the one the patch was generated for. Could you run a sha1...

This can merge after @kristinapathak's big PR. :grin: