Jack Huey
Jack Huey
Implementation-wise, this looks fine to me. Going to change this to waiting-on-fcp for now; please change back to waiting-on-review when FCP is done for a final review from me
So, two thoughts: First, I'd *like* for this to not really be needed in most cases if ever. We *should* be able to use some form of implied bounds here....
@xiamx I actually have (at least for now) decided that this is a bit heavy for me to implement/use (for now, at least), and I can't really devote time to...
I think this is pretty firmly T-types (we do have authority to decide on breaking changes related to types/traits/borrowck), but it doesn't hurt to loop in T-lang. Better to error...
Spurious? @bors try