Stijn de Witt

But every time it happens people get hurt. Those updates cost time and money. It will make people more wary of adopting new features if it happens too much. Standards...

I find it amazing that we had this issue on the old repo: [class decorator optional opts #wycats/23](https://github.com/wycats/javascript-decorators/issues/23), with 156 comments (!!) and, afaik, no formal response from the spec...

Really concise summary: ```js @decorator class SomeClass {} ``` !== ```js @decorator() class SomeClass ``` People are not happy about this. Please just spend some time reading the feedback. People...

A bit disappointing to basically see the whole discussion we had two years ago be repeated now again.... But at least it seems this time the people working on the...

> I think we could do just the () part without the part of treating it entirely as classes. Couldn't agree more! If we can get `@deco` to be equivalent...

Hi guys, I see what the problem is and will look at this soon. Sorry for the late response but this is Open Source and I do it in my...

Yes. I was actually listening for the dev server to start serving files to the _client_ before starting the _server_... It sorta worked out but it doesn't really make sense...

I'd be honored if you would use it for the starterkit! :+1: I'll add @queckezz to the credits :)

I've dropped a mention of our projects in @queckezz issue list. Specifically I am asking him if it's ok if users of `just-wait` take their pick from any of the...

Sorry for the late reply. Yes I will accept a pull request! The open ones are from Greenkeeper and I ignore those sometimes.