Ihar Hubchyk
Ihar Hubchyk
Hello @sethsawant have you pick up any issue? :)
This issue relates to #332
@0x72D0 this should be interesting and easy to do ;)
This issue has higher priority than Hough transform and it should be easier to implement so you could do this first :)
By the way, unit tests for **Shift()** function are not trully correct. They need some modification. From another side I could describe a way how to teat this function properly.
@0x72D0 you might not overcomplicate things :) From another side I didn't mention (which is my bad) that CPU code is with optimisation avoiding float usage. Original logic behind is:...
With your implementation we read input values **4** times: 2 times for first row and 2 times for second row (when we move by one row below). I'm proposing to...
As of now ignore step 7. Let's make working version first even with double data reading.
Yes and no. The implementation of Shift function uses integer values instead of float. I move this issue into Wishlist as of now as it's not urgent :)
Yeah, it would be nice. We're going forward to make a release. As of now we need to merge together CPU, CUDA and OpenCL code under single package.