Borislav Stanimirov
Borislav Stanimirov
I am toying with the idea of proposing the addition CPM-ified and CPM-friendly packages to cpm-cmake. Though I don't yet have a robust enough concrete proposal. So for now I...
I see that some CI jobs are failing, but this PR is definitely not the reason :)
Sure, PRs are welcome
Doesn't this also happen in Esoteric's C API?
Here's the proposed change: https://github.com/Chobolabs/sajson/commit/6e58b624776bdbb0faa7a977731b1eb6157d25bb
No problem. There's nothing urgent :)
I would expand on option B. Instead of having a special syntax for the new macro, allow listing of targets in `CPMDeclarePackage`. Here's some proposed code to illustrate my addition:...
I agree that `TARGETS` is not the best name. I'm thinking `PROVIDES` or `PRODUCES`. To be honest I'm not in love with any of the proposed names for this argument
This feature depends on #414, or something similar if not exactly that, which will allow a clear distinction between a package's lifecycle phases: **declared**, **defined**, and **added**
relevant: I'm working on the 1d/2d cleanup from the interface's (ops) perspective #313