Dan Ibanez
Dan Ibanez
right. fixed the title.
nope no coverage being done right now. CMake and friends should have some integration with that though, and we could put up results the same way we put up documentation....
That sounds fine. What is in this branch?
You're not losing a flag, you have too many flags. That check is failing because a flag exists on an entity that should not be there. However its a very...
@seegyoung is responsible for `verifyField` (if we are thinking of the same function). She should probably debug this, possibly with help from @cwsmith to compile and run. Also, please describe...
The tarball that @KennethEJansen provides should be turned into a nightly test. Thats the only way to prevent it breaking. Unless its big and slow, make it a nightly test...
yea, I'm willing to bet the real trouble lies with periodicity. Still, this sounds like stuff that should work fine, so just needs debugging.
Saving notes to myself, sent by @gsjaardema > There is some showing the basic Ioss structure in https://github.com/gsjaardema/seacas/blob/master/docs/IOSystem.pdf and then another that shows how exodus constructs are mapped into IOSS...
thanks, @tobinw. looking at CodeCoverage.cmake, one issue I have is that coverage is done on a per-test basis, and it would probably be better to use gcov's ability to aggregate...
.... its pretty clear what the solution is. just create the sharing before you call PCU_Comm_Begin, just pass it as an argument to sendFieldData.