Hui Zhou
Hui Zhou
@tkameyama Thanks for the fixes. Could you sign and send us the contribution agreement following this link http://www.mpich.org/documentation/contributor-docs/ ?
@tkameyama How about squash the commits into a single commit?
@tkameyama Could you sign and send us the contribution agreement http://www.mpich.org/documentation/contributor-docs/ ?
The idea of VCI is to reduce thread contention. Having a thread polling other VCIs, even for the case that the other VCI needs progress, may bring the thread contention...
It's not clear what we should do here. The lack of progress in passive RMA is more a design issue that it's unlikely to have a real fix in ch4....
I see. So essentially to split/duplicate `mpich.pc` into `mpi-c`, `mpi-cxx`, and `mpi-fort`. Is it `mpi-c` or `mpi-c.pc`?
This test still fails for `ucx`, but error symptom changed. It is a sporadic TIMEOUT waiting for requests from `ucp_disconnect_nb` The failure had nothing to do with the `darray_pack` part,...
Occassionally I get assertion errors: ``` [41] [pmrs-gpu-240-02:17509:0:17509] callbackq.c:539 Assertion `idx < priv->num_fast_elems' failed [0] No Errors [41] [41] /home/zhouh/pmrs/hzhou/modules/ucx/src/ucs/datastruct/callbackq.c: [ ucs_callbackq_remove_safe() ] [41] ... [41] 536 } else {...
@wesbland Is this PR still in draft?
@wesbland What is the situation with this PR?