Himank Chaudhary

I am planning to first release it for an Array of primitive types and then later for an Array of objects as this needs a lot of changes. Closing this...

Or we can expose versionstamp as one of the primary key alternatives? Similar to what you have described we can call it "sequencer/commitOrder" and then if this is set in...

@efirs One correction to your suggestion, `SetVersionStampedValue ` doesn't allow setting values from outside. It is also something we don't want to expose as we use it for atomic metadata...

> @garrensmith @himank this could be done as an extension of secondary indexes. That's the plan and it would be an easy extension for us.

@efirs should we close this?

Probably filters are not parsed properly.

@adilansari can you also add an example? Would be good to debug.

> Yes, this is tested with a collection with no search index and then updating the collection with a search index. This shouldn't crash or error anything. **Note** that we...

> > > > Yes, this is tested with a collection with no search index and then updating the collection with a search index. This shouldn't crash or error anything....

> Looks good. It might be worth checking if we have an integration test with no search fields just to make sure this doesn't throw errors Yes, many of the...