Han-Wen Nienhuys
Han-Wen Nienhuys
this test was introdcued in c3186132 by @rfjakob . It's not representative of a correctly written FUSE filesystem (the "behind the back" deletions should be coupled with notifications back to...
thanks for your contribution! As discussed above, it would be swell to get a gerrithub review for this. As an aside, I've been mulling implementing NFS natively directly in go-fuse,...
@rfjakob - any update here?
I do not have concrete plans; my comments in the code review have gone unanswered.
https://review.gerrithub.io/c/hanwen/go-fuse/+/1186989
yes, I should add that. Note to self: need to change `NodeOpendirer` interface, so requires a v3 of the package.
see https://review.gerrithub.io/c/hanwen/go-fuse/+/551748 Has anyone ever seen this working in practice?
> FYI: One more issue I noticed in our testing: Default implementation of GetChildren doesn't guarantee the order due to map iteration https://go.dev/blog/maps . This can cause some race in...
sorry, it took me a while to understand: you are saying that concurrent calls in combination with `FOPEN_CACHE_DIR` cause entries to go missing? If yes, that makes perfect sense. Would...
> Just let you know the default impl that iterates Children isn't reproducible and it may cause some confusion if other app wants to use it. if you rebase onto...